Newsletter

Power Management DesignLine  >  Design Center

Details on compensating voltage mode buck regulators

Here is a two part in-depth resource to help you take full advantage of buck regulators.


Page 1 of 6

Power Management DesignLine

Voltage mode buck regulators have become commonplace in today's broad market. Many of these regulators require external compensation. External compensation allows the regulator to be used with a wide range of components and gives the user control over the systems' performance. While the user has considerable control over the system, many find themselves lacking the proper resources to take advantage of this feature.

This paper will discuss the technical motivation behind compensation, derivation of analytical and design oriented transfer functions, establish criteria for the selection of a particular type of network, and provide an illustrative example. In Part 2 you will find a series of 'quick sheets' and appendices that are a useful reference in the design of compensation networks.

Motivation
Due to the abundance of materials related to elementary feedback theory, this paper will assume the reader has prior knowledge of properties including the gain-bandwidth product and the reduction of noise (or other disturbances) due to feedback. We will simply say that the purpose of compensation (feedback) is to alter the closed loop response of a system to meet a given set of requirements.

The requirements of a closed loop system may be classified as rise time, overshoot, and settling time as shown in Figure 1.

Time domain characteristics
Figure 1: Time domain characteristics

These time domain characteristics are related to each other and the frequency domain characteristics of the system. Design usually takes place in the frequency domain since the specifications are more convenient and it gives the simplest criteria with which to work.

Design Criteria
Since the motivation for compensation is to alter the system performance, we will need a model for our particular system. A simplified switcher model is shown in Figure 2a.

Switcher Model
Figure 2a: Switcher Model

One should note that the components inside the dashed box are integrated within a switcher. In some cases the FETs will be used externally. This is, however, of no consequence in the treatment of loop response.

While the model shown in Figure 2a is useful for understanding the function of the control loop, this model may be simplified to aid in our analysis.

The comparator and FETs may be lumped into one circuit element, a voltage controlled voltage source (VCVS) of gain A V/V. This circuit element is typically referred to as the modulator. The modulator gain is either PVIN/VRAMP or a given (constant) value for feedforward topologies.

Small signal linear model
Figure 2b: Linear, small signal switcher model

While there are a number of tradeoffs and interrelationships relating the loop gain to the closed loop performance, a phase margin of 45°-90° and crossover frequency of 1/5th-1/10th the switching frequency should provide good performance, it is typically advisable to have a phase margin of 52° and a crossover frequency of 1/5th the switching frequency.

These requirements may be met by analyzing each component in the system as shown in the following section.

Page 2: Subsystem analysis  

Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6



Rate this article
WORSE | BETTER
1 2 3 4 5





 Featured Jobs
Ascension Health seeking Solutions Development Analyst in St. Louis, MO

National Semiconductor seeking Principal IC Design Engineer in Santa Clara, CA

Taylor Guitars seeking Sr. Web Designer in El Cajon, CA

Covidien seeking Hardware Manager in Boulder, CO

Sierra Nevada seeking Software Engineer in Hagerstown, MD

More jobs on EETimesCareers
 Sponsor
 CAREER CENTER
Ready to take that job and shove it?
SEARCH JOBS:

 SPONSOR

 RECENT JOB POSTINGS
For more great jobs, career related news, features and services, please visit EETimes' Career Center.